after a long-held resistance to participation in the various social media sites on the web (besides blogger that is), i've finally succumbed and have slowly added a facebook page, skype id, twitter site, and now a google+ page. the strange thing about all of this is that, for reasons i won't detail, each site is under a different user id. obviously, the chief reason for this approach is anonymity (though some of the sites are under my real name), but this weekend i started wondering if all of these web identities are more harmful than helpful. is each fractioning off of the whole of my identity breaking me into personas that are less than the total sum?
the precipitating event for these thoughts was the setup of my google+ account. i had been invited by a new friend to join in the beta testing group for this latest entry into the social networking arena, and based on the venue through which i know this individual and others he was inviting, i decided to use one of my various user ids as the profile id. unfortunately, what i didn't realize is that because it's google, when i set up my profile name, it also changed the name associated with any other google product, e.g., gmail. so now my gmail account with its related chat function, which had previously been under my real name, was now listed under a pseudonym, meaning that none of the people that communicated with me through that venue would be able to find me, or conversely, would suddenly have this strange user id that they did not recognize as part of their network. so i then spent, with my new friend's help, the next 30 minutes or so frantically trying to fix it (which i eventually did). but through the course of it all, my new friend learned my real identity.
now i should be clear. as i stated to him via chat, i have no problem with his knowing my real name. he seems like a really decent person, but we've met within a venue in which anonymity tends to be the rule rather than the exception (for good reason), and it frankly does feel odd for someone to know my real name but my not knowing his. at the same time, i was so exhausted by the whole ordeal that i frankly didn't care any more. it's not like i'm trafficking drugs for the mob.
but back to the identity question. what's additionally interesting is that rather than being less of me, the other identities likely allow me to be more fully me than my real self does with all the behavioral expectations shaped by societal norms that are placed on that identity. then there are identities that overlap. the one for this blog is a classic example. there are people that know who "clarus65" is in my actual day to day life. i try not to let this fact inhibit me in my writing because this blog is as much therapy as it is recorded history, and in either case, it would do me no good not to do my best to capture how i'm feeling or what i'm thinking as accurately and fully as possible. if people learn things about me that make them uncomfortable then that's just something we're going to have to work through later. still as is obvious from my shying away from certain details (even in this entry) a little self-censorship does take place.
during the clean-up process for google+, i commented to my new friend that i really needed to get my online life in order. in thinking more about it though maybe what i realized is that my "online life" is just a reflection of my offline life, or that maybe, it's really just life whether expressed on the web or in the flesh. to use a phrase that was oft repeated during the whole google+ incident, it's all very confusing.